<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday ministry tip: Sermon Writing Tip 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeharderministries.com/2008/10/monday-ministry-tip-sermon-writing-tip-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeharderministries.com/2008/10/monday-ministry-tip-sermon-writing-tip-10/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=monday-ministry-tip-sermon-writing-tip-10</link>
	<description>Calling People Back to God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ke4juh</title>
		<link>http://mikeharderministries.com/2008/10/monday-ministry-tip-sermon-writing-tip-10/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>ke4juh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeharder.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-25</guid>
		<description>One of the keys to explaining anything is to know the material well and watch the audience.  If we know our material extremely well and we watch our audience we can be ‘fast on our feet’ and change tactics if we’re not getting feedback indicating comprehension.  Where trouble begins is lack of preparation; if the jump from understanding to application is made too early it will be impossible to see other possibilities that would be found with deeper understanding.

As I see it, expounding or explaining Scripture is a three-step process.

First, understanding and explaining what it meant when it was written, who was the intended audience?  What was the situation being addressed?  What were the cultural conditions at the time?

Second step is to strip out, as well as we can, the cultural context and find the root of the message.  The best example I can think of is 1 Corinthians 11:14-15

14 Isn’t it obvious that it’s disgraceful for a man to have long hair?
15 And isn’t long hair a woman’s pride and joy? For it has been given to her as a covering.
1 Corinthians 11:14-15 (NLT)

Does this mean God is ultimately concerned with the length of one’s hair; or rather that one should look respectable/acceptable considering the social conditions they live in?  My real life example from when I lived in NY, it was not acceptable for a man to have long hair and having long hair made it difficult if not impossible to get a job, however when I moved to Nashville hair length was not an issue but other attributes were looked at more closely.

It is difficult if not impossible to strip out all cultural concerns because we are so heavily influenced by the culture we live in but with practice we can learn to isolate our thinking from the world and have a more neutral perspective.

The third step is application of the root message to the society we live in.  This is where knowing the audience is important because a twenty-something walking into church for the first time in his life, lives in a different world than the choir or deacons.  So it’s important not to blow-away a newcomer with fancy words unless we take time to explain the words in plain English.

I always find the best teachers are those that are still learning and with God’s help may we all continue to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the keys to explaining anything is to know the material well and watch the audience.  If we know our material extremely well and we watch our audience we can be ‘fast on our feet’ and change tactics if we’re not getting feedback indicating comprehension.  Where trouble begins is lack of preparation; if the jump from understanding to application is made too early it will be impossible to see other possibilities that would be found with deeper understanding.</p>
<p>As I see it, expounding or explaining Scripture is a three-step process.</p>
<p>First, understanding and explaining what it meant when it was written, who was the intended audience?  What was the situation being addressed?  What were the cultural conditions at the time?</p>
<p>Second step is to strip out, as well as we can, the cultural context and find the root of the message.  The best example I can think of is 1 Corinthians 11:14-15</p>
<p>14 Isn’t it obvious that it’s disgraceful for a man to have long hair?<br />
15 And isn’t long hair a woman’s pride and joy? For it has been given to her as a covering.<br />
1 Corinthians 11:14-15 (NLT)</p>
<p>Does this mean God is ultimately concerned with the length of one’s hair; or rather that one should look respectable/acceptable considering the social conditions they live in?  My real life example from when I lived in NY, it was not acceptable for a man to have long hair and having long hair made it difficult if not impossible to get a job, however when I moved to Nashville hair length was not an issue but other attributes were looked at more closely.</p>
<p>It is difficult if not impossible to strip out all cultural concerns because we are so heavily influenced by the culture we live in but with practice we can learn to isolate our thinking from the world and have a more neutral perspective.</p>
<p>The third step is application of the root message to the society we live in.  This is where knowing the audience is important because a twenty-something walking into church for the first time in his life, lives in a different world than the choir or deacons.  So it’s important not to blow-away a newcomer with fancy words unless we take time to explain the words in plain English.</p>
<p>I always find the best teachers are those that are still learning and with God’s help may we all continue to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Barnette</title>
		<link>http://mikeharderministries.com/2008/10/monday-ministry-tip-sermon-writing-tip-10/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Barnette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeharder.wordpress.com/?p=71#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Mike I think what your post highlights is the need to be able to relate to the culture in which we find ourselves. I guess the trick is to enage the culture in a way that does not compromises our testimony or our reflection of Jesus but rather in a way that allows us to connect with people outside the church in a sincere and real way. I don&#039;t know that I always strike that balance well, but it is something to strive for. Thanks for the tip.

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike I think what your post highlights is the need to be able to relate to the culture in which we find ourselves. I guess the trick is to enage the culture in a way that does not compromises our testimony or our reflection of Jesus but rather in a way that allows us to connect with people outside the church in a sincere and real way. I don&#8217;t know that I always strike that balance well, but it is something to strive for. Thanks for the tip.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

